Be wise. Be brave. Be tricky. (slithytove) wrote,
Be wise. Be brave. Be tricky.
slithytove

  • Mood:

Non-A, Non-B

I've heard it said a couple of times (it came up in a panel discussion at Readercon last year, for example) that in editing your prose, it's a sign that you've reached the point of diminishing returns and should stop if you find yourself changing something (a word, a line, a scene) from A to B, and then changing it back again.

I'm currently editing/revising/flensing a story I'd put away for a year, getting it ready to send out, and I find myself doing this quite a bit. It occurs to me that it may not be a sign to stop editing, but rather a sign that both A and B should be discarded. If one is significantly better than the other, then that one should sing, and the writer should have no compulsion to change it. If the writer isn't satisfied with either alternative, maybe that's because both are bad.

Might both be equally good instead? I don't think this is usually the case. Because then the writer would be happy with either, and wouldn't have the compulsion to switch back and forth.

Thoughts?
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 7 comments